To reduce undesirable behaviors, stop highlighting the 'bad' acts and instead highlight the 'good' acts while applying social disapproval labels to the 'bad' ones.
To stop a behavior, you must stop highlighting the "bad" acts (which inadvertently normalizes them) and instead highlight the "good" acts while using social disapproval to label the "bad" ones.
This is for anyone in a leadership, communication, or policy role who needs to influence group behavior—specifically when trying to discourage a common but harmful activity. It solves the "backfire" problem where warning people about a behavior actually makes that behavior more common. After reading, you will be able to design communication campaigns that leverage social proof and social disapproval rather than just "reporting" on problems.
The central thesis is that human behavior is heavily influenced by social proof: the tendency to look at what others are doing to determine our own actions. When communicators try to warn the public about a problem (e.g., "Too many people are ignoring mask mandates"), they inadvertently create a "Look at all the people who are doing this" message. This signals to the public that the behavior is common, which actually encourages more people to participate in it.
To fix this, Cialdini argues we must flip the script. Instead of highlighting the "bad" behavior, we must highlight the "good" behavior (the majority). We must show the public that the desired behavior is the norm. Additionally, we must employ communicated social disapproval—giving a name to the undesirable behavior to create a social stigma that discourages participation.
Use this when you need to encourage a group to adopt a new, positive behavior.
Use this to stigmatize a specific violation of rules.
A sign at a national park stated: "YOUR HERITAGE IS BEING VANDALIZED EVERYDAY BY THEFT LOSSES OF PETRIFIED WOOD OF 14 TONS A YEAR." This actually tripled theft (to 7.92%). Conversely, a sign showing a lone thief (implying few people steal) reduced theft by half (to 1.67%). Lesson: Don't normalize the bad behavior by highlighting its frequency.
In a study, participants were asked to litter a handbill. When they saw a man disapprovingly picking up litter from the ground and depositing it in a waste container, the littering rate dropped to zero. Lesson: Social disapproval is a powerful, immediate deterrent.
Researchers looked at "fare dodging" on trains and subways. They asked people what they would call someone who didn't pay their fare. The most common answer was "Cheater." When this word was used in an information campaign, it significantly reduced the problem. Lesson: Specific, socially-charged labels can change behavior.
"Within the lament, 'Look at all the people who are doing this undesirable thing' lurks the undercutting message, 'Look at all the people who are doing it.'" Why it matters: This explains why "awareness" campaigns often fail—they accidentally provide social proof for the bad behavior.
"To suppress the act of littering, displaying social disapproval of the act was exceedingly effective." Why it matters: It highlights that social pressure is often more effective than simple instruction.
"This is the word people will say to themselves about you, or out loud to you, if they see you violating proper practice." (paraphrased) Why it matters: This is the core mechanism of social labeling—making the social cost of the behavior visible.
This week
Ongoing
Reflection questions
Flashcards Q: Why does highlighting a bad behavior often backfire? A: Because it provides "social proof" that the behavior is common, which encourages others to do it.
Q: What is the best way to communicate a new norm? A: By highlighting the "good" behavior and showing that the majority of people are already doing it.
Q: What is "communicated social disapproval"? A: Using social pressure and specific labels to stigmatize undesirable behavior.
Q: What happened in the Petrified Forest study when a sign highlighted "14 tons" of stolen wood? A: It nearly tripled the theft because it normalized the behavior.
Q: How did the "Cheater" label affect fare dodging? A: It significantly reduced the problem by making the social cost of the behavior clear.
This summary is based entirely on the provided text. The text is a blog post/short essay rather than a full-length book. The summary captures Cialdini's specific recommendations for COVID-19 behaviors (social distancing, mask-wearing) and the supporting research (Petrified Forest, littering, fare dodging) provided in the source.
463. How to Get Anyone to Do AnythingFreakonomics RadioCialdini Asks Adam GrantRobert B. CialdiniCialdini Asks Amy CuddyRobert B. CialdiniCialdini Asks Dan ArielyRobert B. CialdiniCialdini Asks Richard ThalerRobert B. CialdiniGreat Pre-Suasion Moments in History Negotiate Yourself a Better DealRobert B. CialdiniGreat Pre-Suasion Moments in History The Perfect Persuasive TacticRobert B. CialdiniGreat Pre-Suasion Moments in History Warren Buffett’s Genius Persuasive TacticRobert B. Cialdini